Author:
Chang Ming Chung,Wu Shufen
Abstract
Summary
It is an important difference in different measures of the marginal cost of public funds whether to take into account the “revenue effect” emphasized by Atkinson and Stern (1974). This paper tries to reconcile two competing measures from a general viewpoint. We demonstrate that the revenue effect represents a distortionary effect associated with commodity taxation as opposed to a “windfall.” We thus derive a new measure which captures the distortionary effect associated with commodity as opposed to lump-sum taxation. This new measure is guaranteed to be higher than unity. Moreover, this new measure lies between the two measures.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Statistics and Probability
Reference31 articles.
1. Aronsson, Thomas (2008), “Social Accounting and the Public Sector”, International Economic Review, 49 (1), pp. 349–375.
2. Atkinson, Anthony B., and Nicholas H. Stern (1974), “Pigou, Taxation and Public Goods”, Review of Economic Studies, 41, pp. 119–128.
3. Atkinson, Anthony B., and Joseph E. Stiglitz (1980), Lectures on Public Economics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
4. Ballard, Charles L. (1990), “Marginal Welfare Cost Calculations: Differential Analysis vs. Balanced-Budget Analysis”, Journal of Public Economics, 41 (2), pp. 263–276.
5. Ballard, Charles L., and Don Fullerton (1992), “Distortionary Taxes and the Provision of Public Goods”, Journal of Economic Perspective, 6 (3) pp. 117–131.