Recent evidence on the relationship between anonymity and response variables for mail surveys-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Recent evidence on the relationship between anonymity and response variables for mail surveys

Published:1986-03 Issue:1 Volume:14 Page:72-82
ISSN:0092-0703
Container-title:Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
language:en
Short-container-title:JAMS

Author:

Downs Phillip E.,Kerr John R.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Marketing,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02722115.pdf

Reference33 articles.

1. Ash, Phillip and Edward Abramson. 1952. “The Effect of Anonymity on Attitude-Questionnaire Response,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47 (July): 722–723.

2. Andreasen, Alan R.. 1970. “Personalizing Mail Questionnaire Correspondence,”Public Opinion Quarterly 24 (Summer): 273–277.

3. Becker, Gilbert and Donald A. Bakal. 1970. “Subject Anonymity and Motivational Distortion in Self-Report Data.”Journal of Clinical Psychology: 207–209.

4. Benson, Lawrence. 1941. “Studies in Secret-Ballot Technique,”Public Opinion Quarterly 5 (March): 79–82.

5. Berman, John, Harriet McCombs and Robert Boruch. 1977. “Notes on the Contamination Method: Two Small Experiments in Assuring Confidentiality of Responses.”Sociological Methods and Research 6: 45–62.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Effect of Prenotification on Mail Survey Response Rate, Speed, Quality and Cost;Proceedings of the 1988 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference;2015

2. Classic Methods in Public Administration Research;Public Administration and Public Policy;2006-11-14

3. Questionnaire surveys in medical research;Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice;2000-11

4. Mail survey response behavior;European Journal of Marketing;1998-12

5. Applications of the Rasch model to evaluation of survey data quality;New Directions for Evaluation;1996-03