Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to examine the species diversity and structure of the strongylid community in domestic horses in Eastern Slovakia. Also, an analysis of the impact of age, sex, and collection location factors on the strongyid communities was performed.
Methods
Twenty-seven horses 1.5–21 years old from two farms in eastern Slovakia with different horse-management conditions were studied. Strongylids were collected after horse treatments with Noromectin (0.2 mg ivermectin); 66,170 specimens were collected and identified. Faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) was performed following fenbendazole (FBZ) and ivermectin (IVM) treatments.
Results
Twenty-four strongylid species were found; horses were infected with 6 to 16 (average = 11.7) species. Six cyathostomin species (Cylicocyclus nassatus, Cyathostomum catinatum, C. pateratum, Cylicostephanus longibursatus, C. goldi, C. calicatus) were the most prevalent; C. catinatum was the dominant species in both farms (Berger-Parker index 0.34 and 0.42). The structure of the strongylid community was multimodal with dominant, subdominant, background, and rare species. The Mantel test showed that horse age and sex did not significantly affect the nematode infracommunity composition (p > 0.05), while the impact of the collection location (farm) was significant (p = 0.03). Additionally, C. longibursatus was identified as the species contributing significantly to the observed farm differences. Strong resistance to FBZ was documented on both farms (FECRT was 36.4% and 22.7%); IVM resistance was not observed (FECRT = 100%).
Conclusion
This study presents the first report on the strongylids parasitizing domestic horses in Eastern Slovakia and gives basic information for further studies of horse parasites and their control in the region.
Funder
Slovak Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Lichtenfels JR (1975) Helminths of domestic equids. Illustrated keys to genera and species with emphasis on north American forms. Proc Helminthol Soc Wash 42:1–92
2. Herd RP (1990) The changing world of worms—the rise of the cyathostomes and the decline of Strongylus vulgaris. Com Cont Educ Pract Vet 12:732–736
3. Lichtenfels JR, Kharchenko VA, Dvojnos GM (2008) Illustrated identification keys to strongylid parasites (strongylidae: Nematoda) of horses, zebras and asses (Equidae). Vet Parasitol 156:4–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.026
4. Nielsen MK, Baptiste KE, Tolliver SC, Collins SS, Lyons ET (2010) Analysis of multiyear studies in horses in Kentucky to ascertain whether counts of eggs and larvae per gram of feces are reliable indicators of numbers of strongyles and ascarids present. Vet Parasitol 174:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.08.007
5. Kuzmina TA, Dzeverin I, Kharchenko VA (2016) Strongylids in domestic horses: influence of horse age, breed and deworming programs on the strongyle parasite community. Vet Parasitol 227:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.07.024