Abstract
AbstractIn government, industry and academia, there is a convergence of three trends: (1) the belief that responsible exploration and mining should increase across Europe, (2) industry should follow and ‘Europeanise’ international good practices and (3) a social licence to operate exists not only between a community and a company but also between society and industry. There are two examples in Europe where these trends are converging—Finland and Spain have both adopted the Canadian Toward Sustainable Mining (TSM) program, but the method of implementation is very different. As a result of Talvivaara, Finland took a network governance approach incorporating trust-building measures from the beginning by bringing diverse stakeholders together to create the Finnish Network for Sustainable Mining. Spain chose to integrate the TSM into their national standards, a more traditional and hierarchical approach but one that also relies on a trustworthy entity with clear longevity. Although implementation is in the early stages in both countries, and therefore this paper provides insights only on preliminary outcomes, results indicate that the network approach may not be better at achieving societal SLO suggesting that other factors such as narrative, dialoguing directly with society, implementing trust-building measures in a timely fashion and proven longevity may have more influence than early trust-building measures between network participants.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference31 articles.
1. Arquilla J, Ronfeldt D (2001) Networks and netwars: the future of terror, crime, and militancy. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1382.html. https://doi.org/10.7249/MR1382
2. Boutilier R (2020) From metaphor to political spin: understanding criticisms of the social licence. The Extractive Industries and Society.:100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.05.022
3. Civil Society open letter (2020) Civil society concerns on EU critical raw materials plans. https://friendsoftheearth.eu/publication/civil-society-concerns-eu-critical-raw-materials-plan/
4. European Commission (2013) Standards and standardisation: a practical guide for researchers. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
5. European Union: European Commission, 2008 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on The raw materials initiative - meeting our critical needs for growth and jobs in Europe, COM(2008) 699 final, available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52008DC0699 [accessed 14 January 2021]
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献