Abstract
Abstract
In this article, we explore concrete examples of circularity strategies for critical raw materials (CRMs) in commercial settings. We propose a company-level framework for systematically evaluating circularity strategies (e.g., material recycling, product reuse, and product or component lifetime extension) in specific applications of CRMs from the perspectives of specific industrial actors. This framework is applied in qualitative analyses—informed by relevant literature and expert consultation—of five case studies across a range of industries: (1) rhenium in high-pressure turbine components, (2) platinum group metals in industrial catalysts for chemical processing and oil refining, (3) rare earth permanent magnets in computer hard disk drives, (4) various CRMs in consumer electronics, and (5) helium in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machines. Drawing from these case studies, three broader observations can be made about company circularity strategies for CRMs. Firstly, there are multiple, partly competing motivations that influence the adoption of circularity strategies, including cost savings, supply security, and external stakeholder pressure. Secondly, business models and value-chain structure play a major role in the implementation of circularity strategies; business-to-business models appear to be more conducive to circularity than business-to-consumer models. Finally, it is important to distinguish between closed-loop circularity, in which material flows are contained within the “focal” actor’s system boundary, and open-loop circularity, in which material flows cross the system boundary, as the latter has limited potential for mitigating material criticality from the perspective of the focal actor.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference88 articles.
1. Achzet B, Helbig C (2013) How to evaluate raw material supply risks—an overview. Resour Policy 38:435–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.06.003
2. Anderson ST (2018) Economics, helium, and the U.S. Federal Helium Reserve: summary and outlook. Nat Resour Res 27:455–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-017-9359-y
3. Apple Inc. (2019a) Material impact profiles: which materials to prioritize for a 100 percent recycled and renewable supply chain
4. Apple Inc. (2019b) Apple expands global recycling programs. https://www.apple.com/ca/newsroom/2019b/04/apple-expands-global-recycling-programs/. Accessed 7 Aug 2020
5. Apple Inc. (2020) Apple Trade In. https://www.apple.com/shop/trade-in. Accessed 23 Nov 2020
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献