Abstract
AbstractRivers are heterogeneous and patchy-structured systems in which regional biodiversity of aquatic communities typically varies as a function of local habitat conditions and spatial gradients. Understanding which environmental and spatial constraints shape the diversity and composition of benthic communities is therefore a pivotal challenge for basic and applied research in river ecology. In this study, benthic invertebrates were collected from 27 sites across three hydro-ecoregions with the aim of investigating patterns in α- and β diversity. We first assessed the contribution to regional biodiversity of different and nested spatial scales, ranging from micro-habitat to hydro-ecoregion. Then, we tested differences in α diversity, taxonomic composition and ecological uniqueness among hydro-ecoregions. Variance partitioning analysis was used to evaluate the mechanistic effects of environmental and spatial variables on the composition of macroinvertebrate communities. Macroinvertebrate diversity was significantly affected by all the spatial scales, with a differential contribution according to the type of metric. Sampling site was the spatial scale that mostly contributed to the total richness, while the micro-habitat level explained the largest proportion of variance in Shannon–Wiener index. We found significant differences in the taxonomic composition, with 39 invertebrate families significantly associated with one or two hydro-ecoregions. However, effects of environmental and spatial controls were context dependent, indicating that the mechanisms that promote beta diversity probably differ among hydro-ecoregions. Evidence for species sorting, due to natural areas and stream order, was observed for macroinvertebrate communities in alpine streams, while spatial and land-use variables played a weak role in other geographical contexts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference80 articles.
1. Alther R, Thompson C, Lods-Crozet B, Robinson CT (2019) Macroinvertebrate diversity and rarity in non-glacial Alpine streams. Aquat Sci 81:42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-019-0642-3
2. Barbour MT, Stribling JB, Verdonschot PF (2006) The multihabitat approach of USEPA's rapid bioassessment protocols: benthic macroinvertebrates. Limnetica 25:839–850
3. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B (2011) Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-42. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Accessed 19 Mar 2020
4. Beisel JN, Usseglio-Polatera P, Thomas S, Moreteau JC (1998) Stream community structure in relation to spatial variation: the influence of mesohabitat characteristics. Hydrobiologia 389:73–88. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003519429979
5. Bo T, Piano E, Doretto A, Bona F, Fenoglio S (2016) Microhabitat preference of sympatric Hydraena Kugelann, 1794 species (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) in a low-order forest stream. Aquat Insect 37:287–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650424.2016.1264604