Can There be Reasons for Putting Limitations on Classical Logic?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Can There be Reasons for Putting Limitations on Classical Logic?

Published:1994 Issue: Volume: Page:89-124
ISSN:
Container-title:Patrick Suppes: Scientific Philosopher
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Weingartner Paul

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-94-011-1152-2_5

Reference43 articles.

1. Cain, J. and Damnjanovic, Z.: 1991, ‘On the Weak Kleene Scheme in Kripke’s Theory of Truth’, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 56(4), 1452–1468.

2. Carnap, R.: 1936, ‘Testability and Meaning’, Philosophy of Science, 3, 420–471. Cleave, J. P.: 1973/74, ‘An Account of Entailment Based on Classical Semantics’, Analysis, 34, 118–122.

3. Czermak, J. and Weingartner, P.: 1983, ‘Criteria for Distinguishing Logically Necessary Proposition’, in: P. Weingartner and J. Czermak (Eds.), Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of the 7th International Wittgenstein Symposium (Kirchberg, 1982), Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, pp. 48–51.

4. Dalla Chiara, M. L.: 1981, ‘Logical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics’, in: E. Agazzi (Ed.), Modern Logic - A Survey, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 331–351.

5. Dalla Chiara, M. L.: 1991, ‘Epistemic Logic - Without Logical Omniscience’, in: G. Schurz and G. Dorn (Eds.), pp. 87–95.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Concerning Peter Vickers's Recent Treatment of ‘Paraconsistencitis’;International Studies in the Philosophy of Science;2014-07-03

2. The Concept of Relevance and the Logic Diagram Tradition;Logica Universalis;2010-03

3. Reasons from Science for Limiting Classical Logic;Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?;2004

4. Forgotten and Neglected Solutions of Problems in Philosophical Logic;The Lvov-Warsaw School and Contemporary Philosophy;1998

5. Under what transformations are laws invariant?;Law and Prediction in the Light of Chaos Research