1. J.R. Ravetz,‘Criticisms of Science’. In I. Spiegel-Rosing and D. de Solla-Price (Eds.), Science, Technology and Society, Sage, Beverley-Hills; 1977, pp. 71–89.
2. This critique could be based, e. g., on the hypothetical-deductive method itself: Science as well as mathematics cannot make sure its own fundaments. This is already Plato’s argument in the State, Book 6, cf G. Böhme, ‘Platons Theorie der exakten Wissenschaften’, in Antike and Abendland, XXII, 1976, pp. 40–53.
3. M. Scheler, Die Wissensformen und die Gesellschaft, Bern, Müchen, Franke 2. Aufl. 1960
4. H. Marcuse, Eros and Civilisation, The Beacon Press, Boston, 1955.
5. The Anti-Science Movement had its main source within the academic youth ‘retreating’ from the scientific scene. It included a lot of heterogenous groups like hippies, green-culture groups, religious sects (christian but mainly oriental), yoga practitioners, psychodelics and other. It had its high tide in the late sixties and the early seventies. For some of the common objections to science see, for example, T. Roszak, The Making of a Counter-Culture: Reflections on the Technocratic Society and its Youthful Opposition, Faber and Faber, London, 1971.