1. Almond, P., P. Winter, R. Cameto, M. Russell, E. Sato, J. Clarke-Midura, C. Torres, G. Haertel, R. Dolan, P. Beddow, and S. Lazarus. 2010. Technology-enabled and universally designed assessment: Considering access in measuring the achievement of students with disabilities—a foundation for research. Journal
of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 10 (5). Retrieved from May 2011: http://www.jtla.org.
2. Bejar, I., and E. A. Graf. 2010. Updating the duplex design for test-based accountability in the twenty-first century measurement. Interdisciplinary Research and Perspective, 8 (2/3): 110–129.
3. Bennett, R. E. 2001. How the Internet will help large-scale assessment reinvent itself. Education Policy Analysis Archives 9(5): 1–25.
4. Bennett, R. E. 2002. Inexorable and inevitable: The continuing story of technology and assessment. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment. Retrieved from May 2011: http://escholarship.bc.edu/jtla/.
5. Bennett, R. E. 2010. Cognitively based assessment of, for, and as learning (CBAL): A preliminary theory of action for summative and formative assessment. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 8: 70–91.