Ethical Objections to Deep Brain Stimulation for Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Enhancement: A Critical Review
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Reference80 articles.
1. Agid, Y., Schupbach, M., Gargiulo, M., Mallet, L., Houeto, J., Behar, C., & Welter, M. L. (2006). Neurosurgery in Parkinson’s disease: The doctor is happy, the patient less so? Journal of Neural Transmission, 70, s409–s414. 2. Andrade, P., Nobless, L. H. M., Temel, Y., Ackermans, L., Lim, L. W., Steinbusch, H. W. M., & Visser-Vandewalle, V. (2010). Neurostimulatory and ablative treatment options in major depressive disorder: A systematic review. Acta Neurochirurgica, 152, 565–577. 3. Baker, L. R. (2000). Persons and bodies: A constitution view. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 4. Bauer, R., Pohl, S., Klosterkotter, J., & Kuhn, J. (2008). Deep brain stimulation in the context of addiction – A literature-based systematic evaluation. Fortschritte der Neurologie – Psychiatrie, 76, 396–401. 5. Baumeister, A. A. (2000). The Tulane electrical brain stimulation program – A historical case study in medical ethics. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 9(3), 262–278.
|
|