On Conflicts between Genetic and Developmental Viewpoints — And Their Attempted Resolution in Molecular Biology-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

On Conflicts between Genetic and Developmental Viewpoints — And Their Attempted Resolution in Molecular Biology

Published:1997 Issue: Volume: Page:243-264
ISSN:
Container-title:Structures and Norms in Science
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Burian Richard M.

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-94-017-0538-7_15

Reference37 articles.

1. Allen, Garland E., 1986. “T. H. Morgan and the split between embryology and genetics, 1910–1935.” In T. J. Horder, J. A. Witkowski, and C. C. Wylie, eds., A History of Embryology ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), pp. 113–146.

2. Bürglin, Thomas R., 1994. “A comprehensive classification of the homeobox genes.” In D. Deboule, ed., Guidebook to the Homeobox Genes ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ), pp. 27–71.

3. Burian, Richard M., MS 1985. “Lillie’s paradox or some hazards of cellular geography.”

4. Burian, Richard M., 1993. “How the choice of experimental organism matters: Reflections on an epistemological aspect of biological practice.” Journal of the History of Biology 26: 351–367.

5. De Robertis, Eddy M., Elaine A. Morita, and Ken W. Y. Cho, 1991. “Gradient fields and homeobox genes,” Development 112: 669–678.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Interaction of Research Systems in the Evo-devo Juncture;Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science;2014-10-09

2. Molecular and Developmental Biology;The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science;2008-01-21

3. The Devil is in the Gestalt;Embryology, Epigenesis and Evolution;2004-03-04

4. A New Synthesis?;Embryology, Epigenesis and Evolution;2004-03-04

5. Creative Development;Embryology, Epigenesis and Evolution;2004-03-04