1. Robertson, I.: Characterization in the Conflict of Laws (1940), pp. 243–244.
2. Nussbaum, I.: Private International Law (1942), pp. 70–73.
3. Unger (1952), Modern L.R., 88; (1959), 43 Transactions of the Grotius Society, 37; (1967), 83 L.Q.R., 427; Mann, Hague Rec. 111 (1964 I), 1, at pp. 6970; Cavers, The Choice of Law Process (1965), 221. Francescakis calls some of them “règles d’application immédiate”. Théorie du renvoi (1958), 11–16, Nos. 7–11; Rev. crit. d.i.p., 1966, 1; Riv. dir. int. prie. e proc., 3 (1967) 691.
4. Morris (1946), 62 Law Q.L. 170.
5. De Nova, Dir. Int. 1959, 13, 500; Mélanges Maury, L(1960), 377; (1966), 54 Calif. L.R.,1569. See Lipstein (1949), 26 B.Y.I.L. 553–555 and the extensive lit. cited [1972 B], 31 Cambridge L.J., p. 72, n. 37; and (1977), 26 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 885 nn. 10–18; see also von Mehren, (1974), 88 Harv. L.R., 347; Mann (1972–73), 46 British Yearbook of International Law, 117, (1975); Sedler (1976), S. Calif. L.R., 27; Lando (1976), 11 Texas Int. L.J., 505.