1. Alexy, R. (1989). A theory of legal argumentation. The theory of rational discourse as theory of legal justification. Oxford: Clarendon press. (Translation of: Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1978).
2. Alexy, R. (2003a). On Balancing and Subsumption. A structural comparison. Ratio Juris 16 (4), pp. 433–449.
3. Alexy, R. (2003b). Constitutional rights, balancing, and rationality. Ratio Juris, 16(2) 131–140.
4. Bertea, S. (2005). Does arguing from coherence make sense? Argumentation 19(4), 433–446.
5. Bustamante, T. (2013). On the argumentum ad absurdum in statutory interpretation: Its uses and normative significance. In: C. Dahlman & E.T. Feteris (Eds.), Legal argumentation theory: Cross-disciplinary perspectives. (pp. 21–43). Dordrecht: Springer.