1. The work was programmed by Dr. Philip Rabinowitz, and the program was run by him on the CDC computer at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot. The English dictionary used was the one arranged on tape by Dr. A. F. Brown (now at Lehigh University) at the University of Pennsylvania, giving a forward and reverse alphabetization of the entries in Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary and in a number of major specialized science dictionaries.
2. Since the dictionary did not list plural, past, and-ing suffixes for each word, the computer results were adjusted to what they would have been if the given word with these suffixes were in the dictionary.
3. Certain other morphemic segmentations can not be directly recognized by this method, e. g. infixed and intercalated morphemes (or that alternant of the past-tense morpheme which appears in took). Secondary indications of this situation can be drawn from the number sequences, including the average of next-neighbors per next-neighbor.
4. Or somewhat more, depending on interpretation of the number sequences.
5. Although such a situation could occur.