1. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945). p. 423; Phenomenology of Perception (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962), p. 369.
2. John O’Neill, Perception, Expression and History: The Social Phenomenology of Maurice Merleau-Ponty (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970).
3. Chaim Perelman, ‘Analogie et Métaphore en Science, Poésie et Philosophie’, in his Le Champ De l’Argumentation (Bruxelles: Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles, 1970), pp. 271–283.
4. John O’Neill, ‘The literary production of natural and social Science inquiry: issues and applications in the social organization of Science’, Canadian Journal of Sociology
6(2) 1981: 105–120; ‘A Realist Model of Knowledge: With a Phenomenological Deconstruction’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences
16(1) 1986: 1-35.
5. For a classical quarrel on this see, Michel Foucault, Folie et déraiaison: Histoire de la folie à l’age classique (Paris: Libraire Pion, 1961) and Jacques Derrida, ‘Cogito and the History of Madness’, in his Writing and Difference (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1978), pp. 31-63.