1. Cf. S. Freud, Standard Edition (SE) (Hogarth Press, 24 volumes 1953–74): ‘A Note on the Unconscious in Psychoanalysis’ (1912), SE 12, 255ff. and especially ‘The Unconscious’ (1915), SE 14, 159ff.
2. On Freud’s theory of primary and secondary processes see especially The Interpretation of Dreams (1900), SE 4–5, 588–614, as well as ‘The Unconscious’ (1915), SE 14, 186–189.
3. F. Brentano, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (1874), tr. Antos C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell and Linda L. McAlister (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973), Book Two, Chapter 2, §§ 2–13.
4. Cf. especially Husserl’s lecture course from 1904–05 entitled ‘Main Topics of Phenomenology and Theory of Knowledge (Hauptstücke aus der Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis)’ This important lecture course deals with phantasy and image-consciousness as well as the themes of perception (Wahrnehmung), attention, and time. The part that deals with the analysis of phantasy and image-consciousness has been published in its entirety in Hua XXIII on pages 1–108. [E. Husserl, Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung. Zur Phänomenologie der anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1898–1925), ed. Eduard Marbach, Husserliana XXIII (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1980)].
5. There are basically two reasons why Husserl abandoned (from 1909 onwards) this account of imagination (and remembering) in terms of the consciousness of an (internal) image: (1) the insight that the schema “apprehension-content of apprehension” borrowed from the analysis of perception did not work for the acts of intuitive presentification (cf. Hua XXIII, No. 8, 265–269); (2) the exploration of the temporal character of inner consciousness in its impressionai and reproductive form (cf. Hua XXIII, No. 14, 301–312; Beilage XXXV, 320–328; No. 15, 329–422).