Tarski, Peirce and Truth-Correspondences in Law: Can Semiotic Truth-Analysis Adequately Describe Legal Discourse?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Tarski, Peirce and Truth-Correspondences in Law: Can Semiotic Truth-Analysis Adequately Describe Legal Discourse?

Published:2011 Issue: Volume: Page:57-73
ISSN:
Container-title:The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Van Fleet Paul

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-94-007-1341-3_3

Reference20 articles.

1. Atkin, Albert. 2006. Peirce’s theory of signs. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/ . Accessed April 22, 2010.

2. Backer, Larry Cata. 2010. What is a corporation? The regulatory effects of difference. Conceptions of Corporate Personality in American Constitutional Law in Citizens United v. FEC.

3. Black, M. 1948. The semantic definition of truth. Analysis 8(4): 49–63.

4. Broekman, Jan M. 2009. Firstness and phenomenology. In: Prospects of Legal Semiotics, Wagner & Broekman [Eds] Springer 37–77.

5. Broekman, Jan M. 2010. The Roberta Kevelson seminar on law and semiotics course book, 45–59. Carlisle: Penn State University, Dickinson School of Law.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Semiotic Theory and Public Administration;Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance;2022

2. Towards a semiotic theory of style in law: a Peircean approach;International Journal of Law in Context;2019-09

3. Semiotic Theory and Public Administration;Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance;2018

4. Semiotic Theory and Public Administration;Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance;2017

5. Faces Face to Face;The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education;2011