Author:
van Eemeren Frans H.,Garssen Bart,Krabbe Erik C. W.,Henkemans A. Francisca Snoeck,Verheij Bart,Wagemans Jean H. M.
Reference177 articles.
1. Aakhus, M. (2003). Neither naïve nor normative reconstruction. Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation. Argumentation, 17(3), 265–290.
2. Aakhus, M. (2011). Crafting interactivity for stakeholder engagement. Transforming assumptions about communication in science and policy. Health Physics, 101(5), 531–535.
3. Aakhus, M., & Lewiński, M. (2011). Argument analysis in large-scale deliberation. In E. T. Feteris, B. Garssen, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics. In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 165–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Amjarso, B. (2010). Mentioning and then refuting an anticipated counterargument. A conceptual and empirical study of the persuasiveness of a mode of strategic manoeuvring. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
5. Baker, G. P. (1895). The principles of argumentation. Boston: Ginn.