1. F. Hayek, The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason 20–21 (1952) [hereinafter Hayek, Abuse of Reason]. (Hayek’s point is not to argue against science but rather to point out the limits of science and to show how the social sciences have in many ways fallen prey to a scientifc abuse of reason).
2. See Posner, ‘Utilitarianism, Economics, and Legal Theory’, 8 J. Legal Stud. 103, 135–136 (1979).
3. See A. Smith, Lectures on Jurisprudence 207, 311–330, 401-407, (R. Meek, D. Raphael & L. Stein eds. 1978) [hereinafter Smith, Jurisprudence]. See also Malloy, ‘Invisible Hand or Sleight of Hand? Adam Smith, Richard Posner and the Philosophy of Law and Economies’, 36 Kan. L. Rev. 209, 238-240 (1988) [hereinafter Malloy, ‘Adam Smith’].
4. See Malloy, ‘The Merits of the Smithian Critique: A Final Word on Smith and Posner’, 36 U. Kan. L. Rev. 267–274 (1988) [hereinafter Malloy, ‘The Merits’].
5. See, e.g., F. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty (1960);