Dutch Cartesian Empiricism and the Advent of Newtonianism-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Dutch Cartesian Empiricism and the Advent of Newtonianism

Published:2013 Issue: Volume: Page:89-104
ISSN:0929-6425
Container-title:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

van Bunge Wiep

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-94-007-7690-6_4

Reference71 articles.

1. Aalderink, Mark. 2010. Philosophy, scientific knowledge, and concept formation in Geulincx and Descartes. Utrecht University: Publications of the Department of Philosophy.

2. Barber, William H. 1979. Voltaire et Newton. In Voltaire and the English, ed. Mason Haydn, 193–202. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation (SVEC 176).

3. Boerhaave, Herman. 1715. Sermo academicus de comparendo certo in physicis. Leiden: Petrus van der Aa.

4. Brunet, Pierre. 1926. Les physiciens hollandais et la méthode expérimentale en France au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Albert Blanchard.

5. Buchdahl, Gerd. 1963. The relevance of Descartes’ philosophy of science for modern philosophy of science. The British Journal for the History of Science 1: 227–249.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Using one’s talents in honor of God: Lambert ten Kate (1674-1731) and Isaac Newton’s natural philosophy;Science in Context;2021-03

2. Willem Jacob 's Gravesande’s philosophical trajectory: “between” Leibniz and Newton;Intellectual History Review;2020-02-26

3. Introduction;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science;2019

4. The Experiments of Willem Jacob ’s Gravesande: A Validation of Leibnizian Dynamics Against Newton?;Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science;2018

5. Introduction;Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science;2018