Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Considerations for Top-Down Governance for Biosecurity and Synthetic Biology

Author:

Hamilton R. Alexander,Mampuys Ruth,Galaitsi S. E.,Collins Aengus,Istomin Ivan,Ahteensuu Marko,Bakanidze Lela

Abstract

AbstractSynthetic biology promises to make biology easier to engineer (Endy 2005), enabling more people in less formal research settings to participate in modern biology. Leveraging advances in DNA sequencing and synthesis technologies, genetic assembly methods based on standard biological parts (e.g. BioBricks), and increasingly precise gene-editing tools (e.g. CRISPR), synthetic biology is helping increase the reliability of and accessibility to genetic engineering. Although potentially enabling tremendous opportunities for the advancement of the global bioeconomy, opening new avenues for the creation of health, wealth and environmental sustainability, the possibility of a more ‘democratic’ (widely accessible) bioengineering capability could equally yield new opportunities for accidental, unintended or deliberate misuse. Consequently, synthetic biology represents a quintessential ‘dual-use’ biotechnology – a technology with the capacity to enable significant benefits and risks (NRC 2004).

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Reference60 articles.

1. Ahteensuu M (2017) Synthetic biology, genome editing, and the risk of bioterrorism. Sci Eng Ethics 23(6):1541–1561

2. Ahteensuu M, Sandin P (2012) The precautionary principle. In: Hillerbrand R, Sandin P, Roeser S, Peterson M (eds) Handbook of risk theory: epistemology, decision theory, ethics and social implications of risk. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 961–978

3. Anyshchenko A (2019) The precautionary principle in EU regulation of GMOs: socio-economic considerations and ethical implications of biotechnology. J Agric Environ Ethics 32(5–6):855–872

4. Baber S (2018) Visa issues prevent several international students from attending iGEM Giant Jamboree. The Tech, 8 November 2018. Available: https://thetech.com/2018/11/08/igem-competition-students. Last accessed 26 Sept 2019

5. Bergeson LL et al (2015) The DNA of the U.S. Regulatory system: are we getting it right for synthetic biology. Woodrow Wilson Center, October 2015

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3