1. New Scholasticism, xlii, 1968, pp. 511–536; refs. in parentheses are to this article.
2. Merton, Robert. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, ed. N.W. Storer ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973 ).
3. Shapin, Steven, Science, 259, 5 February 1993, p. 839.
4. See Heelan, “Galileo, Luther, and the Hermeneutics of Natural Science,” The Question of Hermeneutics: Festschrift for Joseph Kockelmans, edited by Timothy J. Stapleton (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994), pp. 363–375; “Hermeneutical Phenomenology and the History of Science,” in Nature and Scientific Method: William A. Wallace Festschrift, edited by Daniel Dahlstrom (Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1991), pp. 23–36; and “Herméneutique de la Science Expérimentale: La Mécanique Quantique et les Sciences Sociales” (“Hermeneutics of Experimental Science: Quantum Mechanics and the Social Sciences”), forthcoming in the Proceedings of the Seminar on Hermeneutics at Cérisy-laSalle Conference Center, Paris, September, 1994.
5. See Heelan, “Husserl’s Philosophy of Science,” in Husserl’s Phenomenology: A Textbook, edited by J. Mohanty and W. McKenna (Pittsburgh/Washington, D.C.: CARP and University Press of America, 1989 ), pp. 387–428.