1. Ernest Nagel, ‘Logic Without Ontology’, in Naturalism and the Human Spirit (ed. by Yervant H. Krikorian), New York 1944; reprinted in E. Nagel, Logic Without Metaphysics, Glencoe, I11., 1957.
2. Compare ‘analgesic’, ‘anastigmatic’, ‘anesthetic’, etc. I owe the neologism to my colleague, Professor Erazim Kohak.
3. See, for instance, Rudolf Carnap, Philosophy and Logical Syntax, London 1935, pp. 58ff.
4. See W.V. Quine, Word and Object, New York and London 1960, pp. 270–276.
5. I have borrowed the term from Hao Wang. See his ‘The Categoricity Question of Certain Grand Logics’, Mathematische Zeitschrift 59 (1953) 47–56, where he apparently uses the expression in the above sense. Compare ‘grand duke’, ‘grand total’ and ‘grand larceny’. The latter suggests ‘petty logic’ as a label for small-bore calculi, but perhaps the suggestion is invidious. Wang’s own source may be the title of the unfinished Grand Logic of C. S. Peirce. See Peirce’s Collected Papers, vol. VIII, 278–280.