Conclusions: Where Do We Go from Here?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Conclusions: Where Do We Go from Here?

Published:1998 Issue: Volume: Page:355-374
ISSN:0924-5499
Container-title:The GeoJournal Library
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Alexander E. R.

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-94-017-1495-2_19

Reference50 articles.

1. Alexander, E.R. (1998a) Doing the impossible: Notes for a general theory of planning, Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design (forthcoming).

2. Alexander, E.R. (1998b) Planning for Interdependence: Linking Amsterdam, its region, and Europe, AME - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (forthcoming)

3. Alexander, E.R. (1998c) Rationality revisited: Planning paradigms in a post-postmodemist perspective, Presented at the Planning Theory Conference, Oxford 2–4 April, 1998.

4. Alexander, E.R. (1996) After rationality: Towards a contingency theory for planning, in S.J.Mandelbaum, L.Mazza and R.W.Burchell (eds.), Explorations in Planning Theory, Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers State Univ. of NJ, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 45–64.

5. Alexander, E.R. (1995) How Organizations Act Together: Interorganizational Coordination in Theory and Practice, Gordon & Breach, Trenton, NJ/Montreaux.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Impact-based planning evaluation: Advancing normative criteria for policy analysis;Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science;2017-07-21

2. Introduction: New Principles in Planning Evaluation;New Principles in Planning Evaluation;2016-12-05

3. Thinking Through Complex Values;Making Strategies in Spatial Planning;2010

4. The Public Interest in Planning: From Legitimation to Substantive Plan Evaluation;Planning Theory;2002-11

5. Planning Rights: Toward Normative Criteria for Evaluating Plans;International Planning Studies;2002-08