The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives

Author:

Heckel Maria,Vogt Annika R.,Stiel Stephanie,Radon Johannes,Kurkowski Sandra,Goebel Swantje,Ostgathe Christoph,Weber Martin

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Providing high-quality care for the dying is essential in palliative care. Quality of care can be checked, compared, and improved by assessing responses from bereaved next-of-kin. The objectives of this study are to examine quality of care in the last 2 days of life of hospitalized patients considering specific aspects of their place of care. Methods The “Care of the Dying Evaluation” (CODE) questionnaire, validated in German in 2018 (CODE-GER), examines quality of care for the patient and support of next-of-kin, allocating values between 0 (low quality) and 4 (high quality). The total score (0–104) is divided into subscales which indicate support/time given by doctors/nurses, spiritual/emotional support, information/decision-making, environment, information about the dying process, symptoms, and support at the actual time of death/afterwards. Next-of-kin of patients with an expected death in specialized palliative care units and other wards in two university hospitals between April 2016 and March 2017 were included. Results Most of the 237 analyzed CODE-GER questionnaires were completed by the patient’s spouse (42.6%) or children (40.5%) and 64.1% were female. Patients stayed in hospital for an average of 13.7 days (3–276; SD 21.1). Half of the patients died in a specialized palliative care unit (50.6%). The CODE-GER total score was 85.7 (SD 14.17; 25–104). Subscales were rated significantly better for palliative care units than for other wards. Unsatisfying outcomes were reported in both groups in the subscales for information/decision-making and information about the dying process. Conclusion The overall quality of care for the dying was rated to be good. Improvements of information about the dying process and decision-making are needed. Trial registration DRKS00013916

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Oncology

Reference39 articles.

1. Augustussen M, Hounsgaard L, Pedersen ML, Sjogren P, Timm H (2017) Relatives’ level of satisfaction with advanced cancer care in Greenland - a mixed methods study. Int J Circumpolar Health 76(1):1335148. https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2017.1335148

2. Calanzani N, Moens K, Cohen J, Higginson IJ, Harding R, Deliens L, Toscani F, Ferreira PL, Bausewein C, Daveson BA, Gysels M, Ceulemans L, Gomes B, Project P (2014) Choosing care homes as the least preferred place to die: a cross-national survey of public preferences in seven European countries. BMC Palliat Care 13:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-13-48

3. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Palliativmedizin (DGP), Deutscher Hospiz- und PalliativVerband (DHPV) (2015) Palliativversorgung im Krankenhaus Gemeinsame Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Palliativmedizin (DGP) und des Deutschen Hospiz- und PalliativVerbandes (DHPV) zum Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung für ein Hospiz- und Palliativgesetz (HPG). https://www.dgpalliativmedizin.de/images/stories/Stellungnahme_DGP_DHPV_HPG_02092015.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2019

4. Gomes B, Higginson IJ, Calanzani N, Cohen J, Deliens L, Daveson BA, Bechinger-English D, Bausewein C, Ferreira PL, Toscani F, Meñaca A, Gysels M, Ceulemans L, Simon ST, Pasman HRW, Albers G, Hall S, Murtagh FEM, Haugen DF, Downing J, Koffman J, Pettenati F, Finetti S, Antunes B, Harding R, on behalf of P (2012) Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. Ann Oncol 23(8):2006–2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr602

5. Higginson IJ, Sen-Gupta GJ (2000) Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. J Palliat Med 3(3):287–300. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2000.3.287

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3