Central venous catheter–associated complications in pediatric patients diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma: implications for catheter choice

Author:

van den Bosch Ceder H.ORCID,Spijkerman Judith,Wijnen Marc H. W. A.,Hovinga Idske C. L. Kremer,Meyer-Wentrup Friederike A. G.,van der Steeg Alida F. W.,van de Wetering Marianne D.,Fiocco Marta,Morsing Indra E.,Beishuizen Auke

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the most optimal central venous catheter (CVC) for pediatric patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in terms of complications. Methods A retrospective study including patients diagnosed with HL from 2015 to 2021 at the Princess Máxima Center was performed. Patients were followed from CVC insertion until removal or 06–2021, whichever came first. The primary outcome was the CVC-related complication incidence rate (IR) per 1000 CVC-days. Furthermore, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) was calculated by comparing complication IRs between peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAP). Additionally, risk factors for central venous thrombosis (CVT) were identified. Results A total of 98 patients were included. The most frequently observed complications were local irritation/infections (18%; IR 0.93), malfunctions (15%; IR 0.88), and CVC-related CVTs (10%; IR 0.52). Single lumen PICCs were associated with a higher risk of complications (49% vs. 26%; IRR 5.12, CI95% 2.76–9.50), severe complications (19% vs. 7%; IRR 11.96, CI95% 2.68–53.42), and early removal (18% vs. 7%; IRR 9.96, CI95% 2.18–45.47). A single lumen PICC was identified as a risk factor for CVC-related CVT when compared to TIVAPs (12% vs. 7%, IRR 6.98, CI95% 1.45–33.57). Conclusion The insertion of a TIVAP rather than a PICC should be recommended for pediatric patients with HL, especially in the presence of CVT-related risk factors. Future trials should evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants for the primary prevention of CVT in pediatric patients with a PICC and other CVT-related risk factors.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Oncology

Reference38 articles.

1. Gartrell J, Kaste SC, Sandlund JT, Flerlage J, Zhou Y, Cheng C, Estepp J, Metzger ML (2020) The association of mediastinal mass in the formation of thrombi in pediatric patients with non-lymphoblastic lymphomas. Pediatr Blood Cancer 67:e28057. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.28057

2. Chopra V, Anand S, Hickner A, Buist M, Rogers MA, Saint S, Flanders SA (2013) Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 382:311–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60592-9

3. Ellis ML, Okano S, McCann A, McDowall A, Van Kuilenburg R, McCarthy AL, Joubert W, Harper J, Jones M, Mollee P (2020) Catheter-related thrombosis incidence and risk factors in adult cancer patients with central venous access devices. Intern Med J 50:1475–1482. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.14780

4. Moss JG, Wu O, Bodenham AR, Agarwal R, Menne TF, Jones BL, Heggie R, Hill S, Dixon-Hughes J, Soulis E, Germeni E, Dillon S, McCartney E, group Ct, (2021) Central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy (CAVA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 398:403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00766-2

5. Pu YL, Li ZS, Zhi XX, Shi YA, Meng AF, Cheng F, Ali A, Li C, Fang H, Wang C (2020) Complications and costs of peripherally inserted central venous catheters compared with implantable port catheters for cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Cancer Nurs 43:455–467. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000742

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3