Author:
Flora Darcy R.,Evens Andrew M.,Liu Nicholas,Yu Kristina S.,Byrd Rachel,Fanale Michelle A.,Holmes Katherine,Flores Carlos,Surinach Andy,Parsons Susan K.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
As part of the CONNECT study, we evaluated the caregiver role in treatment decision-making when caring for patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) in the USA.
Methods
The CONNECT caregiver survey was administered online December 2020–March 2021 to self-identified adult caregivers of cHL patients recruited from patient referrals and online panels. The caregiver’s role in treatment decision-making, health-related quality of life (HRQoL, PROMIS-Global), and work impacts (WPAI:CG) were assessed.
Results
We surveyed 209 caregivers (58% women; median age 47 years; 54% employed; 53% spouse/partner); 69% of patients cared for were diagnosed with cHL in the past 1–2 years, with 48% having stage III/IV cHL and 29% in remission. More spouse/partner than other caregivers were involved in caregiving at symptom onset (61% vs 27%), whereas more other than spouse/partner caregivers began after first treatment (34% vs 5%). Cure, caregivers’ top treatment goal (49%), was rated higher by spouse/partner than other caregivers (56% vs 42%). More spouse/partner than other caregivers were involved in treatment option discussions with physicians (52% vs 28%), were involved in patients’ treatment decisions (54% vs 23%), and were aligned with patients’ treatment goals (93% vs 79%). While caregivers reported HRQoL similar to that of the general population, nearly 30% of employed caregivers reported work impairment.
Conclusion
Cure was caregivers’ top treatment goal. Spouse/partner vs other caregivers were more involved, were involved earlier, and reported greater alignment with patient treatment goals and decision-making. Caregivers reported good HRQoL; however, caregiving impacted work productivity regardless of patient relationship.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. National Alliance for Caregiving in partnership with the National Cancer Institute and the Cancer Support Community (2016) Cancer caregiving in the U.S. An intense, episodic, and challenging care experience. www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CancerCaregivingReport_FINAL_June-17-2016.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2023
2. CancerCare (2022) Cancer caregivers: national research report on shared treatment decision-making. https://media.cancercare.org/documents/272/original/CancerCare_DecisionMakingReport_20220715.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2023
3. DiMatteo MR (2004) Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 23:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207
4. Høeg BL, Frederiksen MH, Andersen EAW, Saltbæk L, Friberg AS, Karlsen RV, Johansen C, Dalton SO, Horsbøl TA, Bidstrup PE (2021) Is the health literacy of informal caregivers associated with the psychological outcomes of breast cancer survivors? J Cancer Surviv 15:729–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00964-x
5. Irani E, Niyomyart A, Hickman RL (2020) Systematic review of technology-based interventions targeting chronically ill adults and their caregivers. West J Nurs Res 42:974–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919897011
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献