Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The aims of this examination were to compare cancer patients’ fatigue burden with that of the general population, to identify clinical factors that are associated with fatigue, and to test psychometric properties of the fatigue questionnaire MFI-20 including the short-form MFI-10.
Methods
A sample of 1818 German cancer patients was tested with the MFI-20.
Results
The study confirmed that the cancer patients demonstrate a high level of burden from fatigue. The effect size for the comparison between the cancer patients and a sample of the general population (n = 1993) was d = 0.58 based on MFI-20 total scores. In the cancer patients’ sample, females reported slightly higher levels of fatigue than males did (p < 0.05). There was no significant effect of age on fatigue. Advanced tumor stage, the presence of metastases, and a “poorer” Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status were significantly associated with fatigue. The results of the confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) only partly confirmed the factorial structure of the MFI-20.
Conclusion
Despite the insufficient CFA indices, we believe that the scale structure of the MFI-20 should not be changed and that calculating a total fatigue score is justifiable. For those seeking a shorter questionnaire, the MFI-10, which only contains those 10 items which positively indicate fatigue, is a good alternative.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Berger AM, Mooney K, Alvarez-Perez A, Breitbart WS, Carpenter KM, Cella D, Cleeland C, Dotan E, Eisenberger MA, Escalante CP, Jacobsen PB, Jankowski C, LeBlanc T, Ligibel JA, Loggers ET, Mandrell B, Murphy BA, Palesh O, Pirl WF, Plaxe SC, Riba MB, Rugo HS, Salvador C, Wagner LI, Wagner-Johnston ND, Zachariah FJ, Bergman MA, Smith C (2015) Cancer-related fatigue, version 2.2015. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 13(8):1012–1039. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2015.0122
2. Saligan LN, Olson K, Filler K, Larkin D, Cramp F, Yennurajalingam S, Sriram Y, Escalante CP, del Giglio A, Kober KM, Kamath J, Palesh O, Mustian K (2015) The biology of cancer-related fatigue: a review of the literature. Support Care Cancer 23(8):2461–2478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2763-0
3. Abrahams HJG, Gielissen MFM, Schmits IC, Verhagen CAHHVM, Rovers MM, Knoop H (2016) Risk factors, prevalence, and course of severe fatigue after breast cancer treatment. Ann Oncol 27(6):965–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw099
4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: cancer-related fatigue. Version 1. 2016. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/fatigue.pdf. Accessed October 7, 2018
5. Cumming TB, Packer M, Kramer SF, English C (2016) The prevalence of fatigue after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke 11(9):968–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493016669861
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献