Modality preferences for health behaviour interventions for post-treatment cancer survivors: a theoretical investigation

Author:

Leske Morgan,Koczwara Bogda,Morris Julia,Beatty Lisa

Abstract

Abstract Purposes User preferences for how programs are delivered are an important consideration when developing healthy living interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate (a) if cancer survivors prefer telephone or internet delivery for a healthy living intervention and (b) what factors were associated with delivery preference. Methods Australian cancer survivors (18 + years) were invited to complete an online or hardcopy cross-sectional survey measuring social and clinical demographic factors and validated measures of self-efficacy, health literacy, and social support. Results Of the 168 respondents, the majority were female (n = 147, 92%) and breast cancer survivors (n = 122, 80%) and preferred internet delivery (n = 109, 65%). Participants who preferred internet delivery had a longer time since diagnosis (M = 9.85 years, SD = 8.20) compared to those who preferred telephone (M = 6.80 years, SD = 5.54), p = .03. However, logistic regression analyses demonstrated that no other variables (age, gender, socio-economic status, BMI, education, self-efficacy, health literacy, nor social support) had a direct association on delivery preference. Conclusions Cancer survivors appear to prefer internet delivery to telephone, particularly for those further along the survivorship trajectory. Future intervention development should therefore consider the internet modality for delivering accessible health interventions and offer the program to long-term cancer survivors. Whether these findings are replicable in the current post-pandemic phase is an important avenue for future research.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Oncology

Reference45 articles.

1. Rock CL, Byers TE, Colditz GA, Demark-Wahnefried W, Ganz PA, Wolin KY, Elias A, Krontiras H, Liu J, Naughton M, Pakiz B, Parker BA, Sedjo RL, Wyatt H, Rock C, Parker B, Zoumas C, Flatt S, Barkai HS, Heath D, Jacinto L, Pruitt M, Ganz P, Byers T, Sedjo R, Hill J, Hernandez J, Gorman K, Faust C, Van Pelt A, Wolin K, Fagin C, Tappenden J, Izadi S, Azrad M, Blair C, Powell L, Lee Goree L, Kubas K (2013) Reducing breast cancer recurrence with weight loss, a vanguard trial: the Exercise and Nutrition to Enhance Recovery and Good Health for You (ENERGY) trial. Contemp Clin Trials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2012.12.003

2. Lahart IM, Metsios GS, Nevill AM, Carmichael AR (2015) Physical activity, risk of death and recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Acta Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.998275

3. Tollosa DN, Tavener M, Hure A, James EL (2019) Adherence to multiple health behaviours in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00754-0

4. Australia COSo (2018) Position statement on exercise in cancer care. In: Editor (ed)^(eds) Book Position Statement on Exercise in Cancer Care, City.

5. Corbett T, Cheetham T, Müller AM, Slodkowska-Barabasz J, Wilde L, Krusche A, Richardson A, Foster C, Watson E, Little P, Yardley L, Bradbury K (2018) Exploring cancer survivors’ views of health behaviour change: “where do you start, where do you stop with everything?” Psychooncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4732

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3