Adversarial Versus Inquisitorial Systems of Trial and Investigation in Criminal Procedure-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Adversarial Versus Inquisitorial Systems of Trial and Investigation in Criminal Procedure

Published:2018 Issue: Volume: Page:3-17
ISSN:
Container-title:Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology in Europe
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Gunn John,Mevis Paul

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-74664-7_1

Reference17 articles.

1. Brants C. Wrongful convictions and inquisitorial process: the case of the Netherlands. University of Cincinnati Law Review. 2012;80(2012):1069–114.

2. Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. Report. The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, cm 2263 London, HMSO; 1993.

3. Devlin P. The judge. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979.

4. van der Wolf M, van Marle H, Roesch R. Understanding and evaluating contrasting unfitness to stand trial practices: a comparison between Canada and The Netherlands. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 2010;9:245–58.

5. Schwikkard PJ. Possibilities of convergence. An outside perspective on the convergence of criminal procedures in Europe. Deventer: Kluwer; 2008.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Forensic Psychiatry;Tasman’s Psychiatry;2023

2. Impact of Legal Traditions on Forensic Mental Health Treatment Worldwide;Frontiers in Psychiatry;2022-04-25

3. Decision‐making in an inquisitorial system: Lessons from Brazil;Law & Society Review;2022-02-13

4. Forensic mental health in Europe: some key figures;Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology;2020-07-10