A Comparison of Two Approaches Used for Intelligent Planning of Complex Chemical Syntheses-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Comparison of Two Approaches Used for Intelligent Planning of Complex Chemical Syntheses

Published:2014 Issue: Volume: Page:77-88
ISSN:1860-949X
Container-title:Issues and Challenges in Artificial Intelligence
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Hippe Z. S.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-06883-1_7

Reference11 articles.

1. Bunin BA, Siesel B, Morales G, Bajorath J (2007) Chemoinformatics: theory, practice & products. Springer, Berlin

2. Cohagan C, Grzymala-Busse JW, Hippe ZS (2012) Experiments on mining inconsistent data with bagging and the MLEM2 rule induction. J Granular Comp, Rough Sets Int Syst 2:257–271

3. Dugundji J, Ugi I (1973) An algebraic model of constitutional chemistry as a basis for chemical computer programs. Topics Curr Chem 39:19–64

4. Grzymala-Busse JW, Grzymala-Busse WJ, Hippe ZS, Rząsa W (2010) An improved comparison of three rough set approaches to missing attribute values. Control Cybern 39:1–18

5. Hippe ZS, Fic G, Mazur M (1992) A preliminary appraisal of selected problems in computer-assisted organic synthesis. ReclTrav Chim Pays-Bas 111:255–261

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Assessing the impact of deviations in optimized multistep flow synthesis on the scale-up;Reaction Chemistry & Engineering;2020

2. From the Research on Planning of Chemical Syntheses: Computer-Aided Modeling and Prediction of PGI2 Metabolic Reactions;Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing;2016