Author:
Boscia Francesco,Giacipoli Ermete,Ricci Giuseppe D’Amico,Sborgia Giancarlo
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference26 articles.
1. Schwartz SG, et al. Twenty-year follow-up for scleral buckling. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(3):325–9.
2. Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H, Parvaresh MM, Ghanbari H, Mehryar M, Heidari E, Behboudi H, Banaee T, Golestan B, Pseudophakic and Aphakic Retinal Detachment (PARD) Study Group. Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment six-month follow-up results of a single operation— report no. 1. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(8):1421–9.
3. Abdullah AS, et al. Complications of conventional scleral buckling occurring during and after treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010;20(5):321–6.
4. Hay A, et al. Needle penetration of the globe during retrobulbar and peribulbar injections. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(7):1017–24.
5. Duker JS, et al. Inadvertent globe perforation during retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia. Patient characteristics, surgical management, and visual outcome. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(4):519–26.