Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference14 articles.
1. Adamson, Peter, and Filip Karfík. 2017. Proclus’ legacy. In All from one. A guide to Proclus, ed. Pieter d’Hoine and Marije Martijn, 290–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press [This text was written before the publication of this chapter by Adamson and Karfík, which also pays attention to the Renaissance reception of Proclus’ thought.].
2. Allen, Michael J. 1982. Ficino’s theory of the five substances and the Neo-Platonists’ Parmenides. The Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 12: 19–44.
3. Allen, Michael J. 2014. Marsilio Ficino. In Interpreting Proclus. From antiquity to the Renaissance, ed. Stephen Gersh, 353–379. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Beierwaltes, Walter. 1987. Das seiende Eine. Zur neuplatonischen Interpretation der zweiten Hypothesis des platonischen Parmenides: das Beispiel Cusanus. In Proclus et son influence. Actes du colloque de Neuchâtel juin 1985, ed. Gilbert Boss and Carlos Steel, 287–297. Zürich: Éditions du Grand Midi.
5. Claessens, Guy. 2011. Imagination as self-knowledge: Kepler on Proclus’ Commentary on the first book of Euclid’s elements. Early Science and Medicine 16: 179–199.