Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference29 articles.
1. Battersby, M., & Bailin, S. (2011). Critical inquiry: Considering the context. Argumentation, 25(2), 243–253.
2. Biro, J., & Siegel, H. (2006). Pragma-dialectic versus epistemic theories of arguing and arguments: Rivals or partners? In P. Houtlosser, & A. van Rees (Eds.), Considering pragma-dialectics: A festshrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 1–10). Mahuah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. DeRose, K. (2009). The case for contextualism: Knowledge, skepticism, and context (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Fogelin, R. J. (2005). The logic of deep disagreements. Informal Logic, 25(1), 3–11 (Originally published in Informal Logic (1985), 7(1), 1–8).
5. Godden, D. (2005). Deductivism as an interpretive strategy: A reply to Groarke’s recent defense of reconstructive deductivism. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 168–183.