What Did You (Legally) Say? Cooperative and Strategic Interactions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

What Did You (Legally) Say? Cooperative and Strategic Interactions

Published:2016 Issue: Volume: Page:185-199
ISSN:2214-3807
Container-title:Pragmatics and Law
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Bianchi Claudia

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-30385-7_9

Reference27 articles.

1. Bianchi, C. (2013). Implicating. In M. Sbisà & K. Turner (Eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions, handbooks of pragmatics (HoPs) (Vol. 2, pp. 108–142). Berlin: de Gruyter.

2. Carston, R. (2013). Legal texts and canons of construction. A view from current pragmatic theory. In M. Freeman & F. Smith (Eds.), Law and language: Current legal issues (pp. 8–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Endicott, T. (2013). The value of vagueness. In A. Marmor & S. Soames (Eds.), Language in the law (pp. 14–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Grice, P. H. (1967). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 1975, 41–58. Reprinted in Grice 1989, 22–40.

5. Grice, P. H., (1987). Retrospective epilogue. In: Grice 1989, 339–385.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Boilerplate and contractual language: Pseudo-contract or blanket assent?;Intercultural Pragmatics;2023-06-01

2. The functions of presupposition in normative text: an analysis of texts of Italian-language Swiss federal law ;LING ITAL;2023

3. Conveying meaning in legal language – Why the language of legislation needs to be more explicit than ordinary language;Journal of Pragmatics;2022-09

4. Not Directly Stated, Not Explicitly Stored:;Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization;2021-06-21

5. Modelling Perjury: Between Trust and Blame;International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique;2021-02-21