Author:
Bertrand Françoise,Defranc Annemie,Huybens Wouter,De Nil Vicky,Van Landeghem Kristof,Tibax Veerle,Peeters Helga,Mylle Jacques
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference42 articles.
1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Banki, S., & Latham, G. P. (2010). The criterion-related validities and perceived fairness of the situational interview and the situational judgment test in an Iranian organisation. Applied Psychology-An International Review, 59, 124–142.
3. Belgium Federal Government. (2010). Gestion des compétences au sein de l’Administration fédérale. Manuel. Retrieved from
http://www.fedweb.belgium.be/sites/default/files/downloads/Manuel_CM_FR_edition_2.pdf
4. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (1997). Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 143–159.
5. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2002). Situational judgment and job performance. Human Performance, 15(3), 233–254.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1503_01