Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference39 articles.
1. Ackerman, J. M., Maner, J. K., & Carpenter, S. M. (2016). Going all in: Unfavorable sex ratios attenuate choice diversification. Psychological Science, 27, 799–809.
2. Arnocky, S., Ribout, A., Mirza, R. S., & Knack, J. M. (2014). Perceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy, and mate-guarding behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 45–64.
3. Barash, D. P., & Lipton, J. E. (2002). The myth of monogamy: Fidelity and infidelity in animals and people. New York: Macmillan.
4. Barber, N. (2000). The sex ratio as a predictor of cross-national variation in violent crime. Cross-Cultural Research, 34, 264–282.
5. Barber, N. (2001a). On the relationship between marital opportunity and teen pregnancy: The sex ratio question. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 259–267.