On the Possibility of a Preference-Based Power Index: The Strategic Power Index Revisited-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

On the Possibility of a Preference-Based Power Index: The Strategic Power Index Revisited

Published:2014 Issue: Volume: Page:259-286
ISSN:1614-0311
Container-title:Studies in Choice and Welfare
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Schmidtchen Dieter,Steunenberg Bernard

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-05158-1_15

Reference28 articles.

1. Banzhaf, J. F. (1965). Weighted voting doesn’t work: A mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Review, 19, 317–343.

2. Barry, B. (1980). Is it better to be powerful or lucky. Part I and Part II. Political Studies, 18, 183–194. 338–352.

3. Binmore, K. (1992). Fun and games. A text on game theory. D.C. Heath and Company: Lexington.

4. Braham, M., & Holler, M. (2005). The impossibility of a preference-based power index. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17(1), 137–157.

5. Buchanan, J. (1990). The domain of constitutional economics. Constitutional Political Economy, 1(1), 1–18.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Recursive Measure of Voting Power with Partial Decisiveness or Efficacy;The Journal of Politics;2021-09-20

2. Penrose and the Indifferent Crowd;Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: Including A Symposium on Carl Menger at the Centenary of His Death;2021-08-25

3. An issue based power index;International Journal of Game Theory;2020-09-23

4. Voting Power in the EU Council of Ministers and Fair Decision Making in Distributive Politics;SSRN Electronic Journal;2012