1. Bauersfeld, H. (1992). Activity theory and radical constructivism: What do they have in common and how do they differ? Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 1, 15–25.
2. Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Dreyfus, T., Kidron, I., Arzarello, F., Radford, L., Artigue, M., et al. (2010). Networking of theories in mathematics education. In M. M. F. Pinto & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34
th
Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 145–175). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME.
3. Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalisation in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula (Soviet studies in mathematics education, Vol. 2; J. Kilpatrick, Ed., J. Teller, Trans.). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [Original work published 1972].
4. Dreyfus, T., Hadas, N., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz B. B. (2006).Mechanisms for consolidating knowledge constructs. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30
th
International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 465–472). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Education.
5. Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. (2001). Abstraction in context II: The case of peer interaction. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, 307–368.