1. Anderson, R. (2009). Balancing Necessity and Fallibilism: Charles Sanders Peirce on the Status of Mathematics and its intersection with the inquiry into nature. In W. C. Myrvold & J. Christian (Eds.), Quantum Reality, Relativistic Causality, and Closing the Epistemic Circle, The Western Ontario Series in Philsophy of Science (pp. 15–42).
2. Biancani, G. (1615), De Mathematicarum Natura Dissertatio. Bologna. Available at http://archimedes.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/cgi-bin/toc/toc.cgi?dir-bian...
3. Campos, D. G. (2007). Peirce on the role of poietic creation in mathematical reasoning. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 43(3), 470–489.
4. Campos, D. G. (2010). The interpretation and hypothesis-making in mathematics: A peircean account. In M. E. Moore (Ed.) New essays on Peirce’s mathematical philosophy. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court. (pp. 123–145).
5. Campos, D. G. (2011). On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s inference to the best explanation. Synthese, 180, 419–442.