Abstract
AbstractThe restoration of drained afforested peatlands, through drain blocking and tree removal, is increasing in response to peatland restoration targets and policy incentives. In the short term, these intensive restoration operations may affect receiving watercourses and the biota that depend upon them. This study assessed the immediate effect of ‘forest-to-bog’ restoration by measuring stream and river water quality for a 15 month period pre- and post-restoration, in the Flow Country peatlands of northern Scotland. We found that the chemistry of streams draining restoration areas differed from that of control streams following restoration, with phosphate concentrations significantly higher (1.7–6.2 fold, mean 4.4) in restoration streams compared to the pre-restoration period. This led to a decrease in the pass rate (from 100 to 75%) for the target “good” quality threshold (based on EU Water Framework Directive guidelines) in rivers in this immediate post-restoration period, when compared to unaffected river baseline sites (which fell from 100 to 90% post-restoration). While overall increases in turbidity, dissolved organic carbon, iron, potassium and manganese were not significant post-restoration, they exhibited an exaggerated seasonal cycle, peaking in summer months in restoration streams. We attribute these relatively limited, minor short-term impacts to the fact that relatively small percentages of the catchment area (3–23%), in our study catchments were felled, and that drain blocking and silt traps, put in place as part of restoration management, were likely effective in mitigating negative effects. Looking ahead, we suggest that future research should investigate longer term water quality effects and compare different ways of potentially controlling nutrient release.
Funder
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
University of the Highlands and Islands
Marine Alliance for Science and Technology Scotland
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Chemistry
Reference79 articles.
1. Anderson R, Peace A (2017) Ten-year results of a comparison of methods for restoring afforested blanket bogs. Mires Peat 19:1–23 ((Article 06))
2. Andersen R, Farrell C, Graf M, Muller F, Calvar E, Frankard P, Caporn S, Anderson P (2016) An overview of the progress and challenges of peatland restoration in Western Europe. Restor Ecol 25:271–282
3. Anderson R, Vasander H, Geddes N, Laine A, Tolvanen A, O’sullivan A, Aapala K (2016) Afforested and forestry-drained peatland restoration. In: Bonn A (ed) Peatland restoration and ecosystem services: science, policy and practice. Cambridge Univeristy Press, Cambridge, pp 213–233
4. Andersen R, Taylor R, Cowie NR, Svoboda D, Youngson A (2018) Assessing the effects of forest-to-bog restoration in the hyporheic zone at known Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) spawning sites. Mires Peat 23:1–11
5. Asam ZZ, Kaila A, Nieminen M, Sarkkola S, O’Driscoll C, O’Connor M, Sana A, Rodgers M, Xiao L (2012) Assessment of phosphorus retention efficiency of blanket peat buffer areas using a laboratory flume approach. Ecol. Eng. 49:160–169
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献