不同力度推桥弓治疗I级原发性高血压的疗效观察

Author:

Feng Yue,Duan Zhengting,Chen Dongnan,Ye Senlin,Dou Shulin

Abstract

Abstract Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of pushing Qiaogong point with varying intensities for treating stage I essential hypertension. Methods A total of 72 patients diagnosed with stage I essential hypertension were enrolled in this study. They were divided into three groups using the random number table method, including a control group, a gentle pushing group, and a heavy pushing group, with 24 patients in each group. All three groups received the same therapeutic lifestyle interventions. The control group received no additional interventions, the gentle pushing group received additional pushing Qiaogong point with gentle strength, and the heavy pushing group received additional pushing Qiaogong point with heavy strength. The treatment duration was 4 weeks, followed by a 4-week follow-up period, during which blood pressure changes were observed and analyzed in all three groups. Results After treatment, the blood pressure levels in all three groups showed a significant decrease (P<0.05). The effective rate in the control group was 43.5%, in the gentle pushing group was 78.3%, and in the heavy pushing group was 33.3%. The reduction in blood pressure levels in the gentle pushing group was significantly superior to that in both the control group and the heavy pushing group, indicating inter-group statistical significance (P<0.01). The efficacy of the heavy pushing group was comparable to that of the control group, indicating no statistical significance (P>0.05). During the follow-up period, compared with the end of the treatment within the same group, the blood pressure levels remained stable in both the control group and the gentle pushing group, indicating no intra-group statistical significance (P>0.05). The heavy pushing group showed a significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean blood pressure (MBP) compared with the end of the treatment, indicating intra-group statistical significance (P<0.05). During the follow-up, the gentle pushing group had lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) and MBP compared with both the heavy pushing group and the control group, indicating inter-group statistical significance (P<0.01), while there was no inter-group statistical significance in comparing the DBP (P>0.05). There was no statistical significance in comparing the SBP, DBP, and MBP between the heavy pushing group and the control group (P>0.05). Conclusion Pushing Qiaogong point with gentle strength combined with lifestyle interventions showed a higher effective rate and long-term blood pressure stability in the treatment of stage I essential hypertension. Pushing Qiaogong point with varying intensities showed varying effects on patients with stage I essential hypertension.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Complementary and alternative medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. VALLÉE A, SAFAR M E, BLACHER J. Essential hypertension: definitions, hemodynamic, clinical and therapeutic review. Presse Med, 2019, 48(1 Pt 1): 19–28.

2. GARFINKLE M A. Salt and essential hypertension: pathophysiology and implications for treatment. J Am Soc Hypertens, 2017, 11(6): 385–391.

3. FERDINAND K C, NASSER S A. Management of essential hypertension. Cardiol Clin, 2017, 35(2): 231–246.

4. Writing Group of 2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension, Chinese Hypertension League, Chinese Society of Cardiology, Chinese Medical Doctor Association Hypertension Committee, Hypertension Branch of China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care, Hypertension Branch of Chinese Geriatric Medical Association. 2018 Chinese guidelines for the management of hypertension. Zhongguo Xinxueguan Zazhi, 2019, 24(1): 24–56.

5. WANG W C, FENG Y. Research progress of massage in treating essential hypertension. Zhongguo Minjian Liaofa, 2020, 28(15): 108–110.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3