Abstract
AbstractThis article focuses on the ways in which narrative accounts of loneliness in literature problematize current definitions of this important and yet underexplored determinant of health. I argue that the prevailing conceptualization of loneliness in health research, with a general emphasis on social prescribing, obscures other dimensions of loneliness beyond social connectedness that also need to be accounted for in its definition. Drawing on narrative approaches to health and care and taking as a case study Santiago Lorenzo’s Spanish novel Los asquerosos (2018), the article gestures toward a more political—rather than exclusively subjective and relational—reading of loneliness. It shows how the novel’s exploration of loneliness as an ambivalent experience of tranquility and disaffection questions whether there is any direct causation between loneliness and aloneness or social isolation, presenting loneliness not so much as a problem or a social pain in need of curing, but as a symptom of a larger structural crisis. The article also reflects on the ability of literary narratives to illuminate, discuss, and ultimately challenge the underlying dynamics of loneliness, raising questions about how we understand these narratives and the type of agency we attribute to them.
Funder
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2. Ahmed, Sara. 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3. Andrews, Stuart. 2018. “The Possibilities of Loneliness in a Changing World: Performing Place in Withdrawn.” In Narratives of Loneliness: Multidisciplinary Perspectives from the 21st Century, ed. Olivia Sagan and Eric Miller, 198–210. London and New York: Routledge.
4. Berlant, Lauren. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5. Birke, Dorothee. 2021. “Social Reading? On the Rise of a ‘Bookish’ Reading Culture Online.” Poetics Today 42 (2): 149–172.