“This was never about a virus”: Perceptions of Vaccination Hazards and Pandemic Risk in #Covid19NZ Tweets

Author:

Long MaebhORCID,Calude Andreea,Burnette Jessie

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, we draw on qualitative methods from the medical humanities and quantitative approaches from corpus linguistics to assess the different mappings of pandemic risks by Twitter (X) users employing the #Covid19nz hashtag. We look specifically at their responses to government measures around vaccines between August and November 2021. Risk, we reveal, was a major discursive thread in tweets during this period, but within our tweets, it was the vaccine rather than the virus around which hazard perception and response were grouped. We find that the discursive stance of those opposed to the vaccine evoked entangled medical and political hazards, untrustworthy experts, obscure information, restrictions on sovereignty, threats to children, and uncertain future dangers, all of which positioned them within what Ulrich Beck termed the world risk society. We also found that these narratives of risk manifested in specific Twitter styles, which employed a consistently larger number of hashtags. The lack of conjunctions between the hashtags, we argue, encouraged a disordered reading of doubt and precaution, as the hashtags presented triggering phrases whose interconnections were hinted at rather than specified. By contrast, those who tweeted in support of government measures were rhetorically led by solutions rather than risks, with one exception: their perception of those who were vaccine opposed. We use scholarship on risk and precautionary logic to map out the contrasting positions in tweets addressing Aotearoa New Zealand’s pandemic experience during the closing months of 2021.

Funder

Marsden Fund

University of Waikato

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference66 articles.

1. Andre, Francis, Robert Booy, Hans L. Bock, J. Clemens, Sanjoy K. Datta, T.C. John, Bee Wah Lee, et al. 2008. “Vaccination Greatly Reduces Disease, Disability, Death and Inequity Worldwide.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 86 (2): 140–46. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.07.040089

2. Anthony, Laurence. 2022. “AntConc.” Software. Accessed April 14, 2023. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software

3. Ardern, Jacinda. 2021. “Plan for Vaccine Rollout for General Population Announced.” Beehive.govt.nz, June 17, 2021. Accessed April 14, 2023. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/plan-vaccine-rollout-general-population-announced

4. Baker, Paul. 2010. “Corpus Methods in Linguistics.” In Research methods in linguistics, edited by Lia Litosseliti, 93–113. London: Continuum.

5. Baker, Stephanie, and Michael Walsh. 2022. “COVID: How Anti-vaccine Influencers Exploit Mothers.” The Conversation, February 14, 2022. Accessed April 20, 2022. https://theconversation.com/covid-how-anti-vaccine-influencers-exploit-mothers-175670

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3