Cardiac output measured by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis by recently released software version 3.02 versus thermodilution in septic shock-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cardiac output measured by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis by recently released software version 3.02 versus thermodilution in septic shock

Published:2012-11-15 Issue:2 Volume:27 Page:171-177
ISSN:1387-1307
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
language:en
Short-container-title:J Clin Monit Comput

Author:

Slagt Cornelis,de Leeuw Marcel A.,Beute Jan,Rijnsburger Emmy,Hoeksema Martijn,Mulder Jan W. R.,Malagon Ignacio,Groeneveld A. B. Johan

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Health Informatics

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10877-012-9410-9.pdf

Reference17 articles.

1. Breukers RM, Sepehrkhouy S, Spiegelenberg SR, et al. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:632–5.

2. Hofer CK, Button D, Weibel L, et al. Uncalibrated radial and femoral arterial pressure waveform analysis for continuous cardiac output measurement: an evaluation in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:257–64.

3. Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, et al. Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:337–42.

4. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1480–6.

5. Compton FD, Zukunft B, Hoffmann C, et al. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (FloTrac™/Vigileo™) in haemodynamically unstable patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:451–6.

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Accuracy of Cardiac Output Measured by Fourth-Generation FloTrac and LiDCOrapid, and Their Characteristics Regarding Systemic Vascular Resistance in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery;Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia;2023-07

2. Comparative effects of desflurane and sevoflurane on intraoperative peripheral perfusion index: a retrospective, propensity score matched, cohort study;Scientific Reports;2023-03-06

3. Comparison the accuracy and trending ability of cardiac index measured by the fourth-generation of FloTrac with the PiCCO device in septic shock patients;TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES;2020-06-23

4. Evaluation of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System in Comparison With the Intermittent Bolus Thermodilution Method in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery;Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia;2019-04

5. Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass;Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing;2017-10-16