Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Cervical cancer disproportionately burdens low-resource populations where access to quality screening services is limited. A greater understanding of sustainable approaches to implement cervical cancer screening services is needed.
Methods
We conducted a systematized literature review of evaluations from cervical cancer screening programs implemented in resource-limited settings globally that included a formal evaluation and intention of program sustainment over time. We categorized the included studies using the continuum of implementation research framework which categorizes studies progressively from “implementation light” to more implementation intensive.
Results
Fifty-one of 13,330 initially identified papers were reviewed with most study sites in low-resource settings of middle-income countries (94.1%) ,while 9.8% were in low-income countries. Across all studies, visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (58.8%) was the most prevalent screening method followed by cytology testing (39.2%). Demand-side (client and community) considerations were reported in 86.3% of the articles, while 68.6% focused scientific inquiry on the supply side (health service). Eighteen articles (35.3%) were categorized as “Informing Scale-up” along the continuum of implementation research.
Conclusions
The number of cervical cancer screening implementation reports is limited globally, especially in low-income countries. The 18 papers we classified as Informing Scale-up provide critical insights for developing programs relevant to implementation outcomes. We recommend that program managers report lessons learnt to build collective implementation knowledge for cervical cancer screening services, globally.
Funder
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference84 articles.
1. Torre LA, Freddie B, Siegel RL, Jacques F, Joannie L-T, Ahmedin J (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262
2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359–E386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210
3. Beasley JW, Starfield B, van Weel C, Rosser WW, Haq CL (2007) Global health and primary care research. J Am Board Fam Med 20:518–526. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.06.070172
4. Gonzalez-Block MA (2004) Health policy and systems research agendas in developing countries. Health Res Policy Syst 2:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-2-6
5. Brown ML, Goldie SJ, Draisma G, Harford J, Lipscomb J (2011) Health service interventions for cancer control in developing countries. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans DB, et al. (eds) Disease control priorities in developing countries. World Bank, Washington (DC)
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献