Percutaneous cryoablation: a novel treatment option in non-visceral metastases of the abdominal cavity after prior surgery
-
Published:2022-07-02
Issue:9
Volume:47
Page:3345-3352
-
ISSN:2366-0058
-
Container-title:Abdominal Radiology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Abdom Radiol
Author:
van der Reijd D. J.ORCID, Baetens T. R., Gomez Munoz F., Aarts B. M., Lahaye M. J., Graafland N. M., Lok C. A. R., Aalbers A. G. J., Kok N. F. M., Beets-Tan R. G. H., Maas M., Klompenhouwer E. G.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To assess the primary safety and oncological outcome of percutaneous cryoablation in patients with non-visceral metastases of the abdominal cavity after prior surgery.
Methods
All patients with non-visceral metastases after prior abdominal surgery, treated with percutaneous cryoablation, and at least one year of follow-up were retrospectively identified. Technical success was achieved if the ice-ball had a minimum margin of 10 mm in three dimensions on the per-procedural CT images. Complications were recorded using the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) classification system. Time until disease progression was monitored with follow-up CT and/or MRI. Local control was defined as absence of recurrence at the site of ablation.
Results
Eleven patients underwent cryoablation for 14 non-visceral metastases (mean diameter 20 ± 9 mm). Primary tumor origin was renal cell (n = 4), colorectal (n = 3), granulosa cell (n = 2), endometrium (n = 1) and appendix (n = 1) carcinoma. Treated metastases were localized retroperitoneal (n = 8), intraperitoneal (n = 2), or in the abdominal wall (n = 4). Technical success was achieved in all procedures. After a median follow-up of 27 months (12–38 months), all patients were alive. Local control was observed in 10/14 non-visceral metastases, and the earliest local progression was detected after ten months. No major adverse events occurred. One patient suffered a minor asymptomatic adverse event.
Conclusion
This proof-of-concept study suggests that cryoablation can be a minimal invasive treatment option in a selected group of patients with non-visceral metastases in the abdominal cavity after prior surgery.
Graphical abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Urology,Gastroenterology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Reference18 articles.
1. T.L. Lash, A.H. Riis, E.B. Ostenfeld, R. Erichsen, M. Vyberg, T.P. Ahern, O. Thorlacius-Ussing, Associations of Statin Use With Colorectal Cancer Recurrence and Mortality in a Danish Cohort, Am J Epidemiol 186(6) (2017) 679-687. 2. H. Kobayashi, H. Mochizuki, K. Sugihara, T. Morita, K. Kotake, T. Teramoto, S. Kameoka, Y. Saito, K. Takahashi, K. Hase, M. Oya, K. Maeda, T. Hirai, M. Kameyama, K. Shirouzu, T. Muto, Characteristics of recurrence and surveillance tools after curative resection for colorectal cancer: a multicenter study, Surgery 141(1) (2007) 67-75. 3. A. Gunawardene, B. Desmond, A. Shekouh, P. Larsen, E. Dennett, Disease recurrence following surgery for colorectal cancer: five-year follow-up, N Z Med J 131(1469) (2018) 51-58. 4. S.B. Stewart-Merrill, R.H. Thompson, S.A. Boorjian, S.P. Psutka, C.M. Lohse, J.C. Cheville, B.C. Leibovich, I. Frank, Oncologic Surveillance After Surgical Resection for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Novel Risk-Based Approach, J Clin Oncol 33(35) (2015) 4151-7. 5. K. Kobayashi, T. Saito, Y. Kitamura, V. Bilim, T. Toba, T. Kawasaki, N. Hara, T. Tanikawa, Y. Tomita, Clinicopathological features and outcomes in patients with late recurrence of renal cell carcinoma after radical surgery, Int J Urol 23(2) (2016) 132-7.
|
|