Lessons from the Women and Gender Constituency: Interrogating Civil Society Strategies for Organising in the UNFCCC

Author:

Flavell JoannaORCID

Abstract

AbstractWhile scholarship on the topic of gender and the environment is steadily growing, little is known about the challenges faced and successes seen by women and gender NGOs operating as a central part of environment-focused civil society. In this paper, I offer such an analysis, examining the political strategies—rhetorical and procedural—mobilised by the Women and Gender Constituency (WGC) in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). I argue that the WGC has seen lots of success in mobilising arguments that foreground women’s vulnerability to the effects of climate change. But at the same time, the constituency has seen far more resistance to more intersectional feminist arguments that interrogate the role of masculinised discursive power in shaping climate politics. This is at least in part a result of a wider structure of civil society that pigeonholes different identities (e.g. gender, youth, indigenous peoples) in a way that separates their deeply interconnected struggles. Understanding this structural barrier, or dark side of civil society, is crucial to envisioning a more fruitful integration of civil society in sustainability politics.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference70 articles.

1. Acha, M. A. R. (2016). Climate and Environmental Justice Summary of Umbrella Issue eDiscussion 2016. (online). Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://wedo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/CEJ-Discussion-2016-Final.pdf

2. Aguilar, L. (2007). Speech given at high-level roundtable how a changing climate impacts women. In Council of Women World Leaders, WEDO and Henrich Böll Foundation (2007) ‘Report of High-level Roundtable How a Changing Climate Impacts Women. (online). Retrieved July 15, 2020, from https://wedo.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/roundtable-final-report-6-nov.pdf

3. Ahmed, S. (1998). Differences that matter: Feminist theory and postmodernism. Cambridge University Press.

4. Alam, K., Fatema, N., & Ahmed, W. B. (2008). Case Study: Gender Human Security and Climate Change in Bangladesh. (online). Retrieved July 28, 2020, from https://wedo.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/bangladesh-case-study-1.pdf

5. Alber, G. (2009). The women and gender constituency in the climate negotiations. Talking Points. (online). Retrieved July 29, 2020, from http://www.isiswomen.org/phocadownload/print/isispub/wia/wia2009-2/2wia09_15talkpoints_gotelind.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Introduction: Sustainability, Democracy and the Dark Sides of Civil Society;International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society;2023-04-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3