How Is Collective Identity Possible in Democracies? Political Integration and the Leitkultur Debate in Germany

Author:

Bein SimonORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe quest for a common collective identity has become a challenge for modern democracy: Liberal demands for greater inclusion and individual freedom, aspirations for a strong and solidaric political community, as well as nationalist or right-wing populist calls for exclusion and a preservation of hegemonic national identities are creating tensions that cannot be overlooked. This article therefore formulates the central question of how collective identity can be possible in a liberal democracy. Based on a case study on Germany, it will therefore be examined whetherLeitkulturas a model of political integration can serve in generating a functional democratic collective identity. The necessary benchmarks guiding the analysis will be defined beforehand from a systems-theoretical perspective, balancing inclusion and exclusion within three crucial dimensions: normative basics, historic continuity, and affirmative bindings. The results show that a static definition of a GermanLeitkulturwould in the long run neither achieve functional inclusion nor be able to generate the necessary cohesion of a political community, especially regarding the second and third identity dimensions.

Funder

Universität Regensburg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference93 articles.

1. Ahrens, Jörg. 2021. The enigma of origin: the notion of Leitkultur as a contemporary paradigm of Heimat. The Germanic Review 96(3):313–330.

2. Alternative für Deutschland, 2021. Deutschland, aber normal. Wahlprogramm zur Bundestagswahl 2021. https://www.afd.de/wahlprogramm/. Accessed 22 Dec 2021.

3. Amthor, Philipp. 2020. In guter Verfassung? Unser Land braucht eine Leitkultur-Debatte. In Eine Politik für morgen: Die junge Generation fordert ihr politisches Recht, ed. Mark Hauptmann, Ralph Brinkhaus, 19–30. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.

4. Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

5. Assmann, Jan. 2000. Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen, 3rd edn., München: Beck.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Collective political identities and their contribution to the explanation of governmental performance in democracies;Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft;2023-09-22

2. The dysfunctional paradox of identity politics in liberal democracies;Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft;2022-04-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3