Abstract
AbstractStarting from the assessment that contemporary American conservatism is in a state of crisis, manifested in a dynamic of growing radicalization, this article seeks to identify the factors and actors that contributed to this trajectory and to thus elucidate its more fundamental drivers, assuming that Donald Trump and the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movements are symptoms rather than causes of this radicalization. To this effect, a succinct and pointed history of modern American conservatism from its beginnings in the postwar era is presented, using a periodization into three broad eras. Particular attention is given to the internal heterogeneity and conflicts within the conservative movement on a political and an intellectual level that help explain how conservatism as a whole, or at least its dominant forces, has continued to move to the right over the decades. In order to put this trajectory into perspective, a parallel history of German conservatism is used as contrast. One conclusion that can be drawn from this account is that both German and American conservatism are experiencing a crisis, but for very different reasons and with highly different manifestations. While American conservatism is in a radicalization spiral, German conservatism suffers instead from an identity crisis and a loss of any meaningful ideological–political profile.
Funder
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference69 articles.
1. Abrams, Nathan. 2010. Norman Podhoretz and commentary magazine. The rise and fall of the neocons. New York: Continuum.
2. Allitt, Patrick. 2009. The conservatives: ideas and personalities throughout American history. New Haven: Yale University Press.
3. Beiner, Ronald. 2019. The plague of Bannonsim. Critical Review 31:300–331.
4. Bell, Daniel. 1976. The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books.
5. Biebricher, Thomas. 2018. Geistig-moralische Wende: Die Erschöpfung des deutschen Konservatismus. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献